Aug

The very idea of not patenting an invention sounds hilarious to business minded people. But more exchange server hosting more inventors of website development and promotion software and solutions join the popular trend and DO NOT patent their inventions.

So if business people (owners of professional website development service or web site creation software or inventors of some social Tennessee Lemon Laws solution) decide to risk for the only sake of NOT PATENTING their inventions, there must Melatonin something very serious about it.

Let's make a tiny flashback to the history of this non patenting movement.

Perhaps, the first company who started to exercise this approach was Google. The readers can instantly object saying that they saw hundreds of patents from Google. But deeper investigation will show that Google is patenting only independent approaches, possible interpretations, possible improvements of algorithm, interesting equations and many other things that NO ONE on the planet (but Google team, of course) can know for sure how this or that part of the puzzle influences the big Google algorithm (or algo - for short).

To put it into simple worlds Google is doing "puzzle patenting." Imagine that Google's search engine ranking algo consists of millions of puzzles. Google is patenting some of these puzzles and also the "new puzzles" that will or will not be included into the algo (no one can guarantee that this or that "puzzle" will have any value).

What is the advantage of this approach? - With this approach SE optimizers are very 'tough' in finding answers to these questions:

- How to fit all that puzzles together? - How to find out that this very "puzzle" that is patented is included into the big algo?

You can spend your whole life on testing and trying to find out the real truth about the algo.

And now imagine that Google patented its glorious algo. Then anybody can legally get this information - because it's in public access. This would trigger the creation of countless web site creation software, free website development tools, website development and promotion solutions - name it. And all they will be manipulating with the Google algo. That could be the end to the idea of search engine, because all would know how to manipulate its algo.

Should I Patent? What Should I Patent?

Everything depends upon the structured settlement cash of your product. For example, you are selling educational course about how to create website, unique useful tips, etc. After buying it people see the whole info and can duplicate it. For this type of products patenting is a must as it makes you feel safer and at least have legal grounds to slap vicious duplicators.

But if you are selling something that people use but cannot get inside the black box and see how exactly it is working - better do not patent. In this article I mentioned website development and promotion software, tools and solutions. But that can be any type of program or software which is a big piece of programming code. And with this type of products the story is different.

You are welcome to join the public discussion with tips about how to avoid patenting and still get product highly protected.

More tips about Internet industry - what sort of freegoogleadsenseinfofree-google-adsense-information/free-adsense-template-and-ad-formats-tips-what-visual-templates-for-adsense-convert-better/free AdSense templates are bringing more money.
+Useful freemakemoneyinfofree-make-money-info/free-online-selling-tips-advantages-of-selling-online-on-ebay-and-weak-products/online selling tips

Comic book and graphic novel criticism is rarely found outside of niche publications such as Wizard, or the many fan-driven sites that litter the web. Occasionally a mainstream newspaper Lonely? Try searching for somebody nice. publish an article on the medium as a whole, or offer a retrospective on an under appreciated author, usually Alan Moore; but for the most part it is rare to come across comic reviews in any shape or form. I used to believe that this was simply down to media prejudice - and largely it probably is - but when I decided to dedicate my precious spare time to the joys of graphic novel criticism, I soon learnt that the "funny books" were far from the easiest medium to offer an objective evaluation of.

In the era of Stan Lee, comic plots rarely extended beyond an issue. The Fantastic Four would thwart Doctor Doom's plans for world domination and still be home in time to laugh at the Thing's working class idiosyncrasies. While this limited the writers somewhat, it did allow for episodic adventures that were entirely self-contained. Casual readers could pick up the occasional issue and never be far behind the soap opera antics of their favourite characters. Of course, pre-80s comics were considered an enjoyable but disposable pastime. Most were binned after being read, and forgotten soon after.

Naturally, things have changed. Sequential art is now accepted as an art form, though whether such an acceptance entails any benefits is another matter altogether. The contemporary comic book has become a far slower affair, with the sort of storyline that would have filled a single issue back in the sixties now stretched across several. While this makes for far superior graphic novel narratives, it does alienate the casual reader, and leaves the regular collector dangling on tenterhooks before the serial has had time to resume. More importantly, this approach to serial storytelling has rendered the reviewing of individuals comic issues a little pointless - who reviews the first half of a film, or a television drama only up to the first commercial break?

Of course, we could leave the reviews until our favourite series are collected in trade paperback format, but this approach is equally problematic. Many series have reached double digit number of volumes. Should each volume of The Sandman, The Walking Dead, or Y: The Last Man be reviewed individually, or should the series be critiqued as a whole? If comic book critics were to wait until a series had concluded before laying down their position, then very few new books would get the endorsement that quality appraisal offers.

Of course, there are no answers here. The comic medium will continue to suffer the prejudice of literary circles, and isolate those with only a passing interest. But I love the fact that any individual can have citibank student loan consolidation say on the internet, and would rather be guided by the opinions of another comic enthusiast than the tepid, uninspired drivel from a mainstream film or videogame magazine that has temporarily jumped aboard the superhero zeitgeist. With or without mainstream attention, the comic book appears to be stuck comfortably in its niche. Is that such a bad thing?

Carl Doherty created holycr4pholycr4p under supervision of his doctor, who conceived the criticism and categorisation of every film that Carl watches as a way of tackling his obsessive compulsive disorder. He has now watched 23 films, and is not entirely sure he liked any of them. Carl currently resides in Southend-on-Sea where he shares an abandoned warehouse with a buffy-tufted marmoset named Tautilus Samson. Together they have all sorts of adventures.

Read more of Carl's comic, graphic novel, and film related features and reviews, as well as more on holycr4pGraphic Novel Reviews at holycr4pholycr4p